Post by DrGadget on Jun 26, 2013 15:38:59 GMT -5
Watch this video, made by professional cosmological scientists.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyH2D4-tzfM
At 15:13 they say that everything is caused by randomness (accidental).
At 16:50 they discovered the Cosmological Constant.
At 17:33 they still believe in randomness (or luck) causing the universe to be conducive for life.
At 17:45 they realize that nobody could believe this to be accidental. It's not reasonable.
At 18:30 they realized that this happening by chance was out of the question but the alternative (God) was "impossible to contemplate".
At 18:40, watch this cosmologist start stammering and stuttering to avoid saying "controlled by God".
At 19:15 they realized it was impossible to deny that the universe was designed specifically for Mankind.
Notice how the tone changes here to that of a personal attack.
At 20:08 they realized they were caught "between a rock and a hard place".
Why? You observe something and record it. Simple. Your feelings don't matter if you're a real scientist.
At 20:25 they became "afraid".
They were most fearful that Creationists would say, "See we were right all along."
At 20:55 the physicists "shrank" before the idea of an anthropic universe.
This is an emotional reaction, not a scientific process.
At 21:50 they came up with a solution that "required a leap of faith".
Not science. So not science.
At 22:40 they came up with the idea of other universes. Just have infinite universes and we just happen to have gotten lucky by living in the one with the ideal Cosmological Constant.
This is all typical of the mainstream scientific movement. Their motives here were loud and clear. They were doing whatever they could to avoid having to admit that God made the universe. When faced with the overwhelming evidence that God (or "some Designer") did make the universe just for us, they went into emotional panic mode. They also kept silent about their discoveries for fear of Creationists being right.
This is not science. It's doing everything in their power to deny God, and then pretend it's science. They are grasping at straws because the overwhelming evidence points at a Creator God.
After the fact, they will lie and say that they made "discoveries" that led them to their theories about other universes. But they really didn't. The only discovery they made pointed them toward a Creator God, and they did whatever they could to weasel out of it.
These other universes have never been observed, never been measured, and only make sense if you're trying to disprove God. They weren't even considered before it occurred to them that the existence of the Cosmological Constant would topple their house of cards. They were fat, dumb, and happy with the idea of there only being one universe until the realization set in that this universe was specifically created to host life. This drove them to much greater lengths (outside the bounds of science) to deny the evidence they could see, and replace it with something that can't be seen.
And as we all know, once you open the door to infinite universes, you've just evoked Infinite Monkey Theory. Eventually one of those moneys will type out the complete works of Shakespeare. Because with an infinite number of universe can make literally ANYTHING possible. But can any of these unobserved universes have God in them? No, that would be silly. So just to drive home the point of this video, with infinite universes, anything is possible except for God somehow.
Go back and watch the video again, and listen to these guys' own words. Once the observable science indicated a Creator God who built the whole place with Man in mind, they went all emo and sought desperately for something, anything, to disprove their own lying eyes, just for the sole and solitary reason that they couldn't live with themselves if science truly points to God. Which it still does, by the way. Their panic-riddled attempt to call into being an infinite number of mythical alternate dimensions hasn't changed the facts.
This is indeed faith, not science. It is a type of religion that does not rely on facts, but instead on philosophical musings that can't be proved. And indeed this was ONLY done so they could tell themselves there is no God.
They now teach it as fact. And because they state with such certainty the existence of multiple dimensions, you may think that they have proved other dimensions using their scientific data. But they didn't. They did it solely to dodge the obvious conclusion that someone designed all this. And the worst possibility would be the God of the Bible, making those pesky Creationists right for believing in Him.
Let's go a little further into the clip.
At 25:30 look at the smile on the cosmologist's face when he announces that they no longer need a "fine tuner" (meaning they don't need God).
At 26:00 they can see why people like me say this is not science.
They try to weasel out of that too by saying it's all about disproving theories, but it's really not. It's all about the observation - an important step they skipped.
At 26:35 they were headed toward another "trap" that would lead them to a Creator.
OH NOES! NOT A CREATOR! Notice the ominous music as they show a cross.
At 26:55 they flat-out admit that they came up with the concept for the multiple universes to avoid the conclusion that an intelligent force had a hand in any of this. C'mon now. Right there. Do I really need to go any further? How much of an admission do you need? Oh, but I will go further.
At 28:10 they say that maybe one day they can prove these other dimensions.
Translation: Today they can't prove them. There is zero proof for their "truth".
At 28:20 they say they can't even address the question at present.
So are multiple universes a proven fact?
No, by their own admission.
What evidence do we have for multiple universes?
None, by their own admission.
Why are they even discussing multiple universes?
To avoid the conclusion that God is real, by their own admission.
And if there are no other universes?
Then there must be a God, by their own admission.
The Bible actually predicts scientists doing things like this.
Romans 1:18-22
[18] For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
[19] Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
[20] For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
[21] Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
[22] Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And that's exactly what these guys did. They held the truth in unrighteousness.
They could clearly see the invisible things of God, and understood them.
They are without excuse.
They glorified Him not as God.
They entered into vain imaginations.
Their foolish hearts were darkened.
They profess themselves to be wise, but became fools.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyH2D4-tzfM
At 15:13 they say that everything is caused by randomness (accidental).
At 16:50 they discovered the Cosmological Constant.
At 17:33 they still believe in randomness (or luck) causing the universe to be conducive for life.
At 17:45 they realize that nobody could believe this to be accidental. It's not reasonable.
At 18:30 they realized that this happening by chance was out of the question but the alternative (God) was "impossible to contemplate".
At 18:40, watch this cosmologist start stammering and stuttering to avoid saying "controlled by God".
At 19:15 they realized it was impossible to deny that the universe was designed specifically for Mankind.
Notice how the tone changes here to that of a personal attack.
At 20:08 they realized they were caught "between a rock and a hard place".
Why? You observe something and record it. Simple. Your feelings don't matter if you're a real scientist.
At 20:25 they became "afraid".
They were most fearful that Creationists would say, "See we were right all along."
At 20:55 the physicists "shrank" before the idea of an anthropic universe.
This is an emotional reaction, not a scientific process.
At 21:50 they came up with a solution that "required a leap of faith".
Not science. So not science.
At 22:40 they came up with the idea of other universes. Just have infinite universes and we just happen to have gotten lucky by living in the one with the ideal Cosmological Constant.
This is all typical of the mainstream scientific movement. Their motives here were loud and clear. They were doing whatever they could to avoid having to admit that God made the universe. When faced with the overwhelming evidence that God (or "some Designer") did make the universe just for us, they went into emotional panic mode. They also kept silent about their discoveries for fear of Creationists being right.
This is not science. It's doing everything in their power to deny God, and then pretend it's science. They are grasping at straws because the overwhelming evidence points at a Creator God.
After the fact, they will lie and say that they made "discoveries" that led them to their theories about other universes. But they really didn't. The only discovery they made pointed them toward a Creator God, and they did whatever they could to weasel out of it.
These other universes have never been observed, never been measured, and only make sense if you're trying to disprove God. They weren't even considered before it occurred to them that the existence of the Cosmological Constant would topple their house of cards. They were fat, dumb, and happy with the idea of there only being one universe until the realization set in that this universe was specifically created to host life. This drove them to much greater lengths (outside the bounds of science) to deny the evidence they could see, and replace it with something that can't be seen.
And as we all know, once you open the door to infinite universes, you've just evoked Infinite Monkey Theory. Eventually one of those moneys will type out the complete works of Shakespeare. Because with an infinite number of universe can make literally ANYTHING possible. But can any of these unobserved universes have God in them? No, that would be silly. So just to drive home the point of this video, with infinite universes, anything is possible except for God somehow.
Go back and watch the video again, and listen to these guys' own words. Once the observable science indicated a Creator God who built the whole place with Man in mind, they went all emo and sought desperately for something, anything, to disprove their own lying eyes, just for the sole and solitary reason that they couldn't live with themselves if science truly points to God. Which it still does, by the way. Their panic-riddled attempt to call into being an infinite number of mythical alternate dimensions hasn't changed the facts.
This is indeed faith, not science. It is a type of religion that does not rely on facts, but instead on philosophical musings that can't be proved. And indeed this was ONLY done so they could tell themselves there is no God.
They now teach it as fact. And because they state with such certainty the existence of multiple dimensions, you may think that they have proved other dimensions using their scientific data. But they didn't. They did it solely to dodge the obvious conclusion that someone designed all this. And the worst possibility would be the God of the Bible, making those pesky Creationists right for believing in Him.
Let's go a little further into the clip.
At 25:30 look at the smile on the cosmologist's face when he announces that they no longer need a "fine tuner" (meaning they don't need God).
At 26:00 they can see why people like me say this is not science.
They try to weasel out of that too by saying it's all about disproving theories, but it's really not. It's all about the observation - an important step they skipped.
At 26:35 they were headed toward another "trap" that would lead them to a Creator.
OH NOES! NOT A CREATOR! Notice the ominous music as they show a cross.
At 26:55 they flat-out admit that they came up with the concept for the multiple universes to avoid the conclusion that an intelligent force had a hand in any of this. C'mon now. Right there. Do I really need to go any further? How much of an admission do you need? Oh, but I will go further.
At 28:10 they say that maybe one day they can prove these other dimensions.
Translation: Today they can't prove them. There is zero proof for their "truth".
At 28:20 they say they can't even address the question at present.
So are multiple universes a proven fact?
No, by their own admission.
What evidence do we have for multiple universes?
None, by their own admission.
Why are they even discussing multiple universes?
To avoid the conclusion that God is real, by their own admission.
And if there are no other universes?
Then there must be a God, by their own admission.
The Bible actually predicts scientists doing things like this.
Romans 1:18-22
[18] For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
[19] Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
[20] For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
[21] Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
[22] Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And that's exactly what these guys did. They held the truth in unrighteousness.
They could clearly see the invisible things of God, and understood them.
They are without excuse.
They glorified Him not as God.
They entered into vain imaginations.
Their foolish hearts were darkened.
They profess themselves to be wise, but became fools.
